2 Apr 2022

IPCA constrained: How independent is NZ's police watchdog?

From Focus on Politics, 10:00 am on 2 April 2022

"We have police officers telling us things they don't tell police in the criminal investigations against them ... what they do tell us cannot ever be used against them,” - IPCA Chair Judge Colin Doherty

The Independent Police Conduct Authority (IPCA) holds an important constitutional role in New Zealand as the only body to monitor the actions of the police.

The IPCA has completed investigations into 36 of the 39 fatal police shootings since 1990 and in every case has ruled the killings were justified.

But RNZ investigative series Licence to Kill found the IPCA has limited powers to hold the police to account and relies heavily on the resources of the police themselves.

No caption

IPCA chair Judge Colin Doherty and Police Commissioner Andrew Coster Photo: RNZ

The IPCA was established in 1988 and only got its own independent investigators in 2003.

Now it has about 40 staff and a budget of $5 million a year, but its resources are tiny compared to the police's 14,000 staff and budget of $2.2 billion a year.

IPCA chair Judge Colin Doherty says the authority does not have the resources it needs to do the job the way he thinks he should be done.

He steps down from his five-year term in August, and says the IPCA of the future should be totally independent by answering to Parliament like the Ombudsman and the Auditor General, rather than to the government.

He says that would increase its independence from government, but a leading defence lawyer also questions whether the IPCA is independent from the police.

Read more:

The IPCA only independently investigates 2-3 percent of the complaints it receives. Many of the others are simply passed back to police to investigate themselves.

Defence Lawyers Association co-founder Christopher Stevenson says that fuels a perception the IPCA is not genuinely independent - and a lack of transparency doesn't help.

Despite being a Crown Entity, the IPCA is not subject to the Official Information Act (OIA), which closes down a vital accountability mechanism for proper scrutiny.

Stevenson says open justice is essential to a free and democratic society.

"The important point is that the public are able to have confidence in the investigations undertaken by the IPCA and the outcomes. How can that possibly be when they're cloaked in secrecy," he asks. "It's really difficult to see any rational reasoning for such an important public process being cloaked in secrecy."

But Judge Doherty says the secrecy is vital and legislated for.

"That is designed so that people will be free and frank. We cannot divulge anything that comes in here," he says.

"We have police officers telling us things they don't tell police in the criminal investigations against them. The reason for that is that they are able to tell us and what they do tell us cannot ever be used against them. That's in the legislation."

When the IPCA does find fault with police actions it is limited to making recommendations for changes to police policy.

Judge Doherty denies the IPCA is toothless.

"We're gummy. I wouldn't say we're toothless," Judge Doherty says. "We do have quite a bit of influence on police but we are toothless, legislatively, in the sense that we are not the organisation who can make decisions about prosecution, nor can we bring a prosecution."

But Judge Doherty says that should change. He wants the IPCA to have prosecutorial powers, as other similar bodies overseas do. Currently it is left to the police to determine whether criminal charges should be laid and police have never charged an officer with homicide in any of the 39 police shootings since 1990.

In today's Focus on Politics podcast, investigative journalist Guyon Espiner talks to a leading defence lawyer, the chair of the IPCA and the commissioner of police about whether the police watchdog is fit for purpose.

Listen free to Focus on Politics on Apple Podcasts, on  Spotify, on iHeart Radio or wherever you get your podcasts.